linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 07/25] powerpc/ftrace: Use patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <49a8597230713e2633e7d9d7b56140787c4a7e20.1651905939.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Sat,  7 May 2022 08:46:09 +0200
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/25] powerpc/ftrace: Use patch_instruction() return directly

Instead of returning -EPERM when patch_instruction() fails,
just return what patch_instruction returns.

That simplifies ftrace_modify_code():

	   0:	94 21 ff c0 	stwu    r1,-64(r1)
	   4:	93 e1 00 3c 	stw     r31,60(r1)
	   8:	7c 7f 1b 79 	mr.     r31,r3
	   c:	40 80 00 30 	bge     3c <ftrace_modify_code+0x3c>
	  10:	93 c1 00 38 	stw     r30,56(r1)
	  14:	7c 9e 23 78 	mr      r30,r4
	  18:	7c a4 2b 78 	mr      r4,r5
	  1c:	80 bf 00 00 	lwz     r5,0(r31)
	  20:	7c 1e 28 40 	cmplw   r30,r5
	  24:	40 82 00 34 	bne     58 <ftrace_modify_code+0x58>
	  28:	83 c1 00 38 	lwz     r30,56(r1)
	  2c:	7f e3 fb 78 	mr      r3,r31
	  30:	83 e1 00 3c 	lwz     r31,60(r1)
	  34:	38 21 00 40 	addi    r1,r1,64
	  38:	48 00 00 00 	b       38 <ftrace_modify_code+0x38>
				38: R_PPC_REL24	patch_instruction

Before:

	   0:	94 21 ff c0 	stwu    r1,-64(r1)
	   4:	93 e1 00 3c 	stw     r31,60(r1)
	   8:	7c 7f 1b 79 	mr.     r31,r3
	   c:	40 80 00 4c 	bge     58 <ftrace_modify_code+0x58>
	  10:	93 c1 00 38 	stw     r30,56(r1)
	  14:	7c 9e 23 78 	mr      r30,r4
	  18:	7c a4 2b 78 	mr      r4,r5
	  1c:	80 bf 00 00 	lwz     r5,0(r31)
	  20:	7c 08 02 a6 	mflr    r0
	  24:	90 01 00 44 	stw     r0,68(r1)
	  28:	7c 1e 28 40 	cmplw   r30,r5
	  2c:	40 82 00 48 	bne     74 <ftrace_modify_code+0x74>
	  30:	7f e3 fb 78 	mr      r3,r31
	  34:	48 00 00 01 	bl      34 <ftrace_modify_code+0x34>
				34: R_PPC_REL24	patch_instruction
	  38:	80 01 00 44 	lwz     r0,68(r1)
	  3c:	20 63 00 00 	subfic  r3,r3,0
	  40:	83 c1 00 38 	lwz     r30,56(r1)
	  44:	7c 63 19 10 	subfe   r3,r3,r3
	  48:	7c 08 03 a6 	mtlr    r0
	  4c:	83 e1 00 3c 	lwz     r31,60(r1)
	  50:	38 21 00 40 	addi    r1,r1,64
	  54:	4e 80 00 20 	blr

It improves ftrace activation/deactivation duration by about 3%.

Modify patch_instruction() return on failure to -EPERM in order to
match with ftrace expectations. Other users of patch_instruction()
do not care about the exact error value returned.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
v2: Make patch_instruction() return -EPERM in case of failure
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 5 +----
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 98e82fa4980f..1b05d33f96c6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -78,10 +78,7 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, ppc_inst_t old, ppc_inst_t new)
 	}
 
 	/* replace the text with the new text */
-	if (patch_instruction((u32 *)ip, new))
-		return -EPERM;
-
-	return 0;
+	return patch_instruction((u32 *)ip, new);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 7adbdb05fee7..cd25c07df23c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int __patch_instruction(u32 *exec_addr, ppc_inst_t instr, u32 *patch_addr
 	return 0;
 
 failed:
-	return -EFAULT;
+	return -EPERM;
 }
 
 int raw_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr)
-- 
2.35.1