[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93f402d8-d548-c097-c95c-47f8be48b26e@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 17:44:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Gireesh.Hiremath@...bosch.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, bcousson@...libre.com,
tony@...mide.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
mkorpershoek@...libre.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
m.felsch@...gutronix.de, swboyd@...omium.org,
fengping.yu@...iatek.com, y.oudjana@...tonmail.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, colin.king@...el.com
Cc: sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk, VinayKumar.Shettar@...bosch.com,
Govindaraji.Sivanantham@...bosch.com, anaclaudia.dias@...bosch.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: input: mt-matrix-keypad: add guardian
mt matrix keypad bindings definition
On 06/05/2022 09:27, Gireesh.Hiremath@...bosch.com wrote:
> From: Gireesh Hiremath <Gireesh.Hiremath@...bosch.com>
>
> Add binding definition for the support of the Guardian
> mt matrix keypad driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gireesh Hiremath <Gireesh.Hiremath@...bosch.com>
> ---
> Hi Krzysztof
>
> Changes since v1: addressed review comments
>
>>> Add binding definition for the support of the Guardian
>>> mt matrix keypad driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gireesh Hiremath <Gireesh.Hiremath@...bosch.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/input/mt-matrix-keypad.yaml | 134 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/mt-matrix-keypad.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/mt-matrix-keypad.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/mt-matrix-keypad.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..b52cd478f638
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/mt-matrix-keypad.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/mt-matrix-keypad.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: GPIO driven mt matrix keypad device tree bindings
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - vinay <VinayKumar.Shettar@...bosch.com>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> + GPIO driven mt matrix keypad is used to interface a SoC with a mt matrix
>>> + keypad. The mt matrix keypad supports multiple gpio line, all gpio line act
>>
>> s/line/lines/
>
> modified
>
>>> + as row as wel as column lines, a key can be placed at each intersection
>>
>> s/wel/well/
>
> modified
>
>>> + of a unique row number not equal to a unique column and they are diagonally
>>> + symmetric.
>>> +
>>
>> What is "mt" in the "mt matrix"?
>>
>
> mt is bosch measuring tools matrix keypad
Then it is a specific Bosch device, isn't it? If it is, you should have
vendor prefixes - to the file name and compatible. If it is not, then
"mt" is irrelevant here because it is Bosch product name.
>
>>> + Example- For 5 gpio lines, possible matrix is 5x5 and maximum possible
>>> + keys are 10.
>>> +
>>> + Sample matrix table for 7 button and 5 gpio line
>>> +
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + |Row\Col |GPIO 0 | GPIO 1 | GPIO 2 | GPIO 3 | GPIO 4 |
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + | GPIO 0 | X | KEY_9 | KEY_2 | X | KEY_1 |
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + | GPIO 1 | KEY_9 | X | KEY_6 | X | X |
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + | GPIO 2 | KEY_2 | KEY_6 | X | KEY_4 | KEY_7 |
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + | GPIO 3 | X | X | KEY_4 | X | KEY_8 |
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + | GPIO 4 | KEY_1 | X | KEY_7 | KEY_8 | X |
>>> + ------------------------------------------------------
>>> + X - invalid key
>>> + KEY_x - preferred key code
>>> +
>>> + The mt matrix keypad can sense a key-press and key-release by means of GPIO
>>> + lines and report the event using GPIO interrupts to the cpu.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + oneOf:
>>> + - const: gpio-mt-matrix-keypad
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - gpio-mt-matrix-keypad
>>> + - const: gpio-mt-matrix-keypad
>>
>> Aren't all these compatibles the same?
>
> modified
>
>>> +
>>> + debounce-delay-ms:
>>> + description: Delay after the first bounce of button.
>>> + default: 0
>>> +
>>> + col-scan-delay-us:
>>> + description: Delay before scanning next active line.
>>> + default: 0
>>> +
>>> + number-of-button:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> + description: Number of button connected to the keypad controller.
>>
>> s/button/buttons/ I presume.
>
> modified
>
>>> +
>>> + linux,no-autorepeat:
>>> + description: |
>>> + Disable the Linux input system's autorepeat feature on the input device.
>>> +
>>> + gpio-activelow:
>>> + description: Gpio line are active low.
>>
>> No, GPIOs should instead use common flags.
>
> this flag is used to compare with the gpio read value
Which is not an answer to my concerns and still a no. Just use the
flags. What's the point to code it like:
line-gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
gpio-activelow;
?
Or even worse:
line-gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
gpio-activelow;
With such coding, enabled is 0 or 1? Which flag is correct?
No, just use existing flags, don't duplicate standard Linux stuff.
>
>>> +
>>> + line-gpios:
>>> + description: |
>>> + Gpio lines connected to keypad controller.
>>> + all gpio line act as row as wel as column lines.
>>> +
>>> + linux,keymap:
>>> + $ref: '/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array'
>>> + description: |
>>> + An array of packed 1-cell entries containing the equivalent of row,
>>> + column and linux key-code. The 32-bit big endian cell is packed as:
>>> + row << 24 | column << 16 | key-code
>>
>> But anyway this should be just merged into matrix-keypad. It's a simpler
>> set of that binding.
>
> we have special keypad for Bosch measuring tools, which is not completely
> matric keypad so we have derived from matrix_kepad.c to make our keypad
> to work.
Just customize the original keypad, don't duplicate features. Again it's
not the answer to my concerns. You implement a driver for device with a
smaller set of features, so there should be no problem in merging it
into original driver (which supports more features).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists