lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 8 May 2022 00:20:11 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: leds: qcom-lpg: Add compatible for
 PM660L LPG block

Hi Pavel!

On 2022-05-07 23:19:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > Document the availability of an LPG configuration for the PM660L PMIC in
> > the Qualcomm Light Pulse Generator driver.
> 
> Thank you, but I could not apply it.

Thank you for notifying me.  It seems the diff-context changed a little
when the pm8350c-pwm patches were applied, the series is now rebased on
linux-leds and re-sent as [1] (I may have forgotten to pass -v2 to git
format-patch, apologies for that).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20220507221123.2201668-4-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/T/#u

> Can you collect reviews

Unless I missed something there only seems to be one Acked-by from Rob,
on the dt-bindings patch - I hope that's enough and otherwise Bjorn may
want to chime in on the LPG code part.

> I'll only be able to apply first two.

No worries about that, I expect Bjorn to pick up the latter two through
the arm-msm tree.  Is it okay if I send all patches as a unified series
going forward, or should it rather be split per sub-tree/maintainer?

Last but not least, a friendly reminder to look at patch [2] (resent as
[3]) to complement Bjorn's LPG patches.

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210418213427.220638-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210915080252.69147-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/

- Marijn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ