[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220508092346.255826-11-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 17:23:45 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>, Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/11] perf c2c: Update documentation for new display option 'peer'
Since the new display option 'peer' is introduced, this patch is to
update the documentation to reflect it.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt
index 6f69173731aa..cc98a7e774f6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ REPORT OPTIONS
-d::
--display::
- Switch to HITM type (rmt, lcl) to display and sort on. Total HITMs as default.
+ Switch to HITM type (rmt, lcl) or peer snooping type (peer) to display
+ and sort on. Total HITMs (tot) as default.
--stitch-lbr::
Show callgraph with stitched LBRs, which may have more complete
@@ -174,12 +175,18 @@ For each cacheline in the 1) list we display following data:
Cacheline
- cacheline address (hex number)
- Rmt/Lcl Hitm
+ Rmt/Lcl Hitm (For display with HITM types)
- cacheline percentage of all Remote/Local HITM accesses
+ Snoop Peer (For display with peer type)
+ - cacheline percentage of peer access
+
LLC Load Hitm - Total, LclHitm, RmtHitm
- count of Total/Local/Remote load HITMs
+ Snoop Peer
+ - count of peer access
+
Total records
- sum of all cachelines accesses
@@ -211,6 +218,9 @@ For each offset in the 2) list we display following data:
HITM - Rmt, Lcl
- % of Remote/Local HITM accesses for given offset within cacheline
+ Snoop Peer
+ - % of peer accesses for given offset within cacheline
+
Store Refs - L1 Hit, L1 Miss, N/A
- % of store accesses that hit L1, missed L1 and N/A (no available) memory
level for given offset within cacheline
@@ -227,8 +237,9 @@ For each offset in the 2) list we display following data:
Code address
- code address responsible for the accesses
- cycles - rmt hitm, lcl hitm, load
- - sum of cycles for given accesses - Remote/Local HITM and generic load
+ cycles - rmt hitm, lcl hitm, load, peer
+ - sum of cycles for given accesses - Remote/Local HITM, generic load and
+ peer access
cpu cnt
- number of cpus that participated on the access
@@ -251,7 +262,8 @@ The 'Node' field displays nodes that accesses given cacheline
offset. Its output comes in 3 flavors:
- node IDs separated by ','
- node IDs with stats for each ID, in following format:
- Node{cpus %hitms %stores}
+ Node{cpus %hitms %stores} (For display with HITM types)
+ Node{cpus %peers %stores} (For display with "peer" type)
- node IDs with list of affected CPUs in following format:
Node{cpu list}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists