[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220509162559.2387784-3-oupton@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:25:59 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
To: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
alexandru.elisei@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com, tabba@...gle.com,
qperret@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Don't mask already zeroed FEAT_SVE
FEAT_SVE is already masked by the fixed configuration for
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1; don't try and mask it at runtime.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
index 33f5181af330..3f5d7bd171c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
@@ -90,9 +90,6 @@ static u64 get_pvm_id_aa64pfr0(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u64 set_mask = 0;
u64 allow_mask = PVM_ID_AA64PFR0_ALLOW;
- if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- allow_mask &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
-
set_mask |= get_restricted_features_unsigned(id_aa64pfr0_el1_sys_val,
PVM_ID_AA64PFR0_RESTRICT_UNSIGNED);
--
2.36.0.512.ge40c2bad7a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists