linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND] can: j1939: do not wait 250ms if the same addr was already claimed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220509170303.29370-1-devid.filoni@egluetechnologies.com>
Date:   Mon,  9 May 2022 19:03:03 +0200
From:   Devid Antonio Filoni <devid.filoni@...uetechnologies.com>
To:     Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Maxime Jayat <maxime.jayat@...ile-devices.fr>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Devid Antonio Filoni <devid.filoni@...uetechnologies.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] can: j1939: do not wait 250ms if the same addr was already claimed

This is not explicitly stated in SAE J1939-21 and some tools used for
ISO-11783 certification do not expect this wait.

Fixes: 9d71dd0 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Signed-off-by: Devid Antonio Filoni <devid.filoni@...uetechnologies.com>
---
 net/can/j1939/address-claim.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
index f33c47327927..1d070c08edf1 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
@@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ static void j1939_ac_process(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 * leaving this function.
 	 */
 	ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_name_locked(priv, name);
+
+	if (ecu && ecu->addr == skcb->addr.sa) {
+		/* the address was already claimed with the same name, nothing to do */
+		goto out_ecu_put;
+	}
+
 	if (!ecu && j1939_address_is_unicast(skcb->addr.sa))
 		ecu = j1939_ecu_create_locked(priv, name);
 
-- 
2.25.1