[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8735hir0j4.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 21:03:43 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: lockdep: Delete local_irq_enable_in_hardirq()
No more users and there is no desire to grow new ones.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 18 ------------------
1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -222,24 +222,6 @@ devm_request_any_context_irq(struct devi
extern void devm_free_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, void *dev_id);
-/*
- * On lockdep we dont want to enable hardirqs in hardirq
- * context. Use local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() to annotate
- * kernel code that has to do this nevertheless (pretty much
- * the only valid case is for old/broken hardware that is
- * insanely slow).
- *
- * NOTE: in theory this might break fragile code that relies
- * on hardirq delivery - in practice we dont seem to have such
- * places left. So the only effect should be slightly increased
- * irqs-off latencies.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-# define local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() do { } while (0)
-#else
-# define local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() local_irq_enable()
-#endif
-
bool irq_has_action(unsigned int irq);
extern void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq);
extern bool disable_hardirq(unsigned int irq);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists