[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220509194541.GA91598@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 14:45:41 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2][next] x86/mm/pgtable: Fix -Wstringop-overflow warnings
Fix the following -Wstringop-overflow warnings when building with GCC-12.1:
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:437:13: warning: 'preallocate_pmds' accessing 8 bytes in a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:440:13: warning: 'preallocate_pmds' accessing 8 bytes in a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:462:9: warning: 'free_pmds' accessing 8 bytes in a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:454:9: warning: 'pgd_prepopulate_pmd' accessing 8 bytes in a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:455:9: warning: 'pgd_prepopulate_user_pmd' accessing 8 bytes in a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:464:9: warning: 'free_pmds' accessing 8 bytes in a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
There is a case in which PREALLOCATED_PMDS, MAX_PREALLOCATED_PMDS,
PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS and MAX_PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS are defined as
zero:
204 #else /* !CONFIG_X86_PAE */
205
206 /* No need to prepopulate any pagetable entries in non-PAE modes. */
207 #define PREALLOCATED_PMDS 0
208 #define MAX_PREALLOCATED_PMDS 0
209 #define PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS 0
210 #define MAX_PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS 0
211 #endif /* CONFIG_X86_PAE */
It seems that GCC is legitimately complaining about the fact that, under
certain circumstances, u_pmds and pmds are declared as zero-length arrays
in the stack and, of course, they are not flexible arrays.
424 pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
425 {
426 pgd_t *pgd;
427 pmd_t *u_pmds[MAX_PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS];
428 pmd_t *pmds[MAX_PREALLOCATED_PMDS];
429
Notice that "Accessing elements of zero-length arrays declared in such
contexts is undefined and may be diagnosed."[1]
We can fix this by checking that MAX_PREALLOCATED_PMDS and MAX_PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS
are different than zero, prior to passing u_pmds amd pmds as arguments to any
function, in this case to functions preallocate_pmds(), pgd_prepopulate_pmd()
and free_pmds().
This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable
-Wstringop-overflow.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/181
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Check MAX_PREALLOCATED_PMDS and MAX_PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS
instead of using pointer notation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20220401005834.GA182932@embeddedor/
- Update changelog text.
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
index f16059e9a85e..96c3f402a1da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -434,14 +434,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
mm->pgd = pgd;
- if (preallocate_pmds(mm, pmds, PREALLOCATED_PMDS) != 0)
- goto out_free_pgd;
+ if (MAX_PREALLOCATED_PMDS != 0 && MAX_PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS != 0) {
+ if (preallocate_pmds(mm, pmds, PREALLOCATED_PMDS) != 0)
+ goto out_free_pgd;
- if (preallocate_pmds(mm, u_pmds, PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS) != 0)
- goto out_free_pmds;
+ if (preallocate_pmds(mm, u_pmds, PREALLOCATED_USER_PMDS) != 0)
+ goto out_free_pmds;
- if (paravirt_pgd_alloc(mm) != 0)
- goto out_free_user_pmds;
+ if (paravirt_pgd_alloc(mm) != 0)
+ goto out_free_user_pmds;
+ } else {
+ goto out_free_pgd;
+ }
/*
* Make sure that pre-populating the pmds is atomic with
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists