[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdniSVMOwkBke2EcgONn_Vmv88M+B2FTYL_BKtWawCSLAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:50:01 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] x86/build: add -fno-builtin flag to prevent shadowing
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:01 AM Vincent MAILHOL
<mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Instead, I am thinking of just using -fno-builtin-ffs to remove
> the annoying -Wshadow warning. Would that make more sense?
Perhaps a pragma would be the best tool to silence this instance of
-Wshadow? I understand what GCC is trying to express, but the kernel
does straddle a weird place between -ffreestanding and a "hosted" env.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists