[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b394bfcf-9f0d-b27c-5bc0-3d628de98755@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 15:55:54 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: ionut_n2001@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Lower verbosity of disabled
watchdog hardware
On 5/9/22 09:33, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> If watchdog hardware has been disabled, currently the kernel driver
> will show at err level during probe:
>
> "Watchdog hardware is disabled"
>
> This is unnecessarily verbose as there is already a -ENODEV returned.
> Lower the level to debug.
Is it ? Without this message, a user may try to load the driver,
get an error message, and have no idea why the driver was not
enabled even though the hardware exists. If anything , -ENODEV
is less than perfect. Unfortunately there does not seem to be
a better error code, or at least I don't see one.
Guenter
>
> Reported-by: ionut_n2001@...oo.com
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215762
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
> index 86ffb58fbc85..e51ecbd5c8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int sp5100_tco_timer_init(struct sp5100_tco *tco)
>
> val = readl(SP5100_WDT_CONTROL(tco->tcobase));
> if (val & SP5100_WDT_DISABLED) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Watchdog hardware is disabled\n");
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Watchdog hardware is disabled\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists