[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41d6b00f-d8ac-ca54-99db-ea99c9049e0a@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 08:48:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>,
René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dt-bindings: net: dsa: make reset optional and add
rgmii-mode to mt7531
On 08/05/2022 19:04, Peter Geis wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 8:12 AM Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the issue is more for the description itself.
>>>
>>> Devicetree is only meant to describe the hardware and does in general don't
>>> care how any firmware (Linux-kernel, *BSD, etc) handles it. So going with
>>> "the kernel does it this way" is not a valid reason for a binding change ;-) .
Exactly. The argument in commit msg was not matching the change, because
driver implementation should not be (mostly) a reason for such changes.
>>>
>>> Instead in general want to reason that there are boards without this reset
>>> facility and thus make it optional for those.
>>
>> if only the wording is the problem i try to rephrase it from hardware PoV.
>>
>> maybe something like this?
>>
>> https://github.com/frank-w/BPI-R2-4.14/commits/5.18-mt7531-mainline2/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek%2Cmt7530.yaml
Looks ok.
>>
>> Another way is maybe increasing the delay after the reset (to give more time all
>> come up again), but imho it is no good idea resetting the gmac/mdio-bus from the
>> child device.
>>
>> have not looked into the gmac driver if this always does the initial reset to
>> have a "clean state". In this initial reset the switch will be resetted too
>> and does not need an additional one which needs the gmac/mdio initialization
>> to be done again.
>
> For clarification, the reset gpio line is purely to reset the phy.
> If having the switch driver own the reset gpio instead of the gmac
> breaks initialization that means there's a bug in the gmac driver
> handling phy init.
> In testing I've seen issues moving the reset line to the mdio node
> with other phys and the stmmac gmac driver, so I do believe this is
> the case.
Yes, this seems reasonable, although Frank mentioned that reset is
shared with gmac, so it resets some part of it as well?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists