linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: stm32: Unshadow np variable in stm32_pctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30a2c669-693f-45ec-df0e-610e1f94bffd@foss.st.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 09:39:57 +0200
From:   Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: stm32: Unshadow np variable in
 stm32_pctl_probe()

Hi Andy


Thank you for the patch.

Will this patch be applied in Linus pinctrl tree, or in the gpio-intel 
tree before being merged (linux-next) in the pinctrl tree?

BR

Fabien



On 07/05/2022 12:22, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The np variable is used globally for stm32_pctl_probe() and in one of
> its code branches. cppcheck is not happy with that:
> 
>    pinctrl-stm32.c:1530:23: warning: Local variable 'np' shadows outer variable [shadowVariable]
> 
> Instead of simply renaming one of the variables convert some code to
> use a device pointer directly.
> 
> Fixes: bb949ed9b16b ("pinctrl: stm32: Switch to use for_each_gpiochip_node() helper")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com>



> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> index e73f2d24611f..5d1d067b2247 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -1364,8 +1364,9 @@ static int stm32_gpiolib_register_bank(struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl, struct fwnode
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> -static struct irq_domain *stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(struct device_node *np)
> +static struct irq_domain *stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>   	struct device_node *parent;
>   	struct irq_domain *domain;
>   
> @@ -1482,23 +1483,19 @@ static int stm32_pctrl_create_pins_tab(struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl,
>   
>   int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> -	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	const struct stm32_pinctrl_match_data *match_data;
>   	struct fwnode_handle *child;
> -	const struct of_device_id *match;
>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl;
>   	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
>   	int i, ret, hwlock_id;
>   	unsigned int banks;
>   
> -	if (!np)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	match = of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev);
> -	if (!match || !match->data)
> +	match_data = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!match_data)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "pins-are-numbered", NULL)) {
> +	if (!device_property_present(dev, "pins-are-numbered")) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> @@ -1510,7 +1507,7 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
>   
>   	/* check for IRQ controller (may require deferred probe) */
> -	pctl->domain = stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(np);
> +	pctl->domain = stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(pdev);
>   	if (IS_ERR(pctl->domain))
>   		return PTR_ERR(pctl->domain);
>   
> @@ -1526,10 +1523,10 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	spin_lock_init(&pctl->irqmux_lock);
>   
>   	pctl->dev = dev;
> -	pctl->match_data = match->data;
> +	pctl->match_data = match_data;
>   
>   	/*  get optional package information */
> -	if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "st,package", &pctl->pkg))
> +	if (!device_property_read_u32(dev, "st,package", &pctl->pkg))
>   		dev_dbg(pctl->dev, "package detected: %x\n", pctl->pkg);
>   
>   	pctl->pins = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->match_data->npins,