[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnjUqm3lu75+LjqH@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 09:45:30 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: perf: no need to initialise statics to 0
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:23:12AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Static variables do not need to be initialised to 0, because compiler
> will initialise all uninitialised statics to 0. Thus, remove the
> unneeded initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
I would strongly prefer that we leave this as-is.
There is no problem with explicitly initializing a static variable to 0, and it
clearly aligns with the cmpxchg arguments below. Removing the initialization
makes that *less* clear.
Thanks,
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index cb69ff1e6138..919fdcf8fce6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ static struct ctl_table armv8_pmu_sysctl_table[] = {
>
> static void armv8_pmu_register_sysctl_table(void)
> {
> - static u32 tbl_registered = 0;
> + static u32 tbl_registered;
>
> if (!cmpxchg_relaxed(&tbl_registered, 0, 1))
> register_sysctl("kernel", armv8_pmu_sysctl_table);
> --
> 2.35.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists