[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220509084617.GA352398@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:46:17 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Clark <James.Clark@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/23] perf intel-pt: Better support for perf record
--cpu
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:44:02AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
[...]
> > Thanks a lot for this patch set, I believe this is a common issue for
> > AUX trace (not only for Intel-PT), so I verified this patch set for both
> > Arm CoreSight and SPE; unfortunately both cannot see MMAP events for
> > migrated task. I used below commands:
> >
> > # perf record -B -N --no-bpf-event -e cs_etm//u -C 0 -- taskset --cpu-list 1 uname
> > # perf script --no-itrace --show-mmap-events -C 1 2>/dev/null | grep MMAP | wc -l
> > 0
> >
> >
> > # perf record -B -N --no-bpf-event -e arm_spe_0//u -C 0 -- taskset --cpu-list 1 uname
> > # perf script --no-itrace --show-mmap-events -C 1 2>/dev/null | grep MMAP | wc -l
> > 0
> >
> > I didn't dive into details for this patch set, so I cannot say the
> > failure is caused by any issue in this patch set. But it's definitely
> > we need to look into for Arm platforms to root cause what's the reason
> > it cannot record MMAP events properly when migrate tasks. Loop James
> > and German for this reason.
>
> You would need the equivalent of patch "perf intel-pt: Track sideband
> system-wide when needed" which makes use of new helper
> evlist__add_aux_dummy() to set up the dummy event with the option to
> make it "system wide".
>
> cs_etm_recording_options() and arm_spe_recording_options() have similar
> code.
Thanks a lot for the guidance.
I applied the simliar change for cs_etm_recording_options() and
arm_spe_recording_options(), both can pass below tests:
# perf record -B -N --no-bpf-event -e cs_etm//u -C 0 -- taskset --cpu-list 1 uname
# perf script --no-itrace --show-mmap-events -C 1 2>/dev/null | grep MMAP | wc -l
4
# perf record -B -N --no-bpf-event -e arm_spe_0//u -C 0 -- taskset --cpu-list 1 uname
# perf script --no-itrace --show-mmap-events -C 1 2>/dev/null | grep MMAP | wc -l
4
And I tested a more complex case for migrating a test program 'sysbench'
in the middle of perf session, it still fails to parse any samples
testing program 'sysbench'. I need to do more homework for this part,
but welcome any suggestions, thanks! The testing script is:
---8<---
export PATH=/mnt/export/arm-linux-kernel/tools/perf/:$PATH
perf record --kcore -C 1 -e cs_etm// &
PERF_PID=$!
echo "Perf PID ${PERF_PID}"
sleep 2
taskset 0x1 ./sysbench --test=memory --max-requests=1000000000 run &
TEST_PROG_PID=$!
echo "Test Prog PID ${TEST_PROG_PID}"
sleep 1
taskset -p 0x2 $TEST_PROG_PID
sleep 1
kill $PERF_PID
> You will need to decide if it is worth the extra sideband. I decided
> if it became an issue, it could be made optional in the future.
Yeah, the condition checking for system wide tracking in patch 16/23
looks good to me.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists