[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220509093938.fdrh5hhhreqi46wn@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 09:39:38 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 01:06:18AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 07:23:58AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > ## Patch series status
> >
> > The Rust support is still to be considered experimental. However,
> > support is good enough that kernel developers can start working on the
> > Rust abstractions for subsystems and write drivers and other modules.
>
> I'd really like to see this landed for a few reasons:
>
> - It's under active development, and I'd rather review the changes
> "normally", incrementally, etc. Right now it can be hard to re-review
> some of the "mostly the same each version" patches in the series.
>
> - I'd like to break the catch-22 of "ask for a new driver to be
> written in rust but the rust support isn't landed" vs "the rust
> support isn't landed because there aren't enough drivers". It
> really feels like "release early, release often" is needed here;
> it's hard to develop against -next. :)
+1 to both points. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists