[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02be1caf-1f17-7c81-4167-ade690cb6e41@i2se.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:51:52 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Adrien Thierry <athierry@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: vchiq_arm: get rid of global device
structure
Hi Adrien,
Am 05.05.22 um 20:11 schrieb Adrien Thierry:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>> i understand the motivation, but could you please explain more in detail
>> why you decided to add vchiq_instance instead of device reference? I
>> think vchiq_instance is a more internal structure which should be
>> avoided in kernel consumers like bcm2835-audio or mmal.
> I used the vchiq_instance instead of the device reference because in order
> to get rid of the vchiq_states array (patch 3/3 [1]), I needed another way
> to access the vchiq_state in the 'handle_to_service' function. So I passed
> the vchiq_instance to it (I could also have passed the state directly
> instead of the instance), and this propagated in the caller chain all the
> way up to 'vchiq_bulk_transmit' and friends which are used in the
> bcm2835-audio consumer.
Okay, in this case please add this explanation to the commit message.
Best regards
> Please let me know if you see a better way of
> doing this :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrien
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220502183045.206519-4-athierry@redhat.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists