lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0960C132-581C-4881-8948-C566657C3998@alien8.de>
Date:   Mon, 09 May 2022 11:25:22 +0000
From:   Boris Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec on x86_64

On May 9, 2022 10:40:01 AM UTC, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com> wrote:
>> powerpc and ARM64 both achieve this using device tree with a
>> "linux,ima-kexec-buffer" node. x86 platforms generally don't make use of
>> device tree

What's wrong with making x86 use the same devicetree node(s)?

-- 
Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ