[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220509033655.f2fsbis72hrjft6q@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 09:06:55 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix typo when cpufreq device remove
On 07-05-22, 01:08, Schspa Shi wrote:
> This should check cpufreq_driver->exit pointer before call this function
>
> Fixes: 91a12e91dc39 ("cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down and bring up of
> CPUs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 43dfaa8124e2..0f59c8ec2b39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
>
> if (cpumask_empty(policy->real_cpus)) {
> /* We did light-weight exit earlier, do full tear down now */
> - if (cpufreq_driver->offline)
> + if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
> cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
>
> cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
NAK.
The code is doing fine and there is a comment above it on why it is
doing it this way.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists