linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 10:15:01 -0400
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        USB mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 09:46:25AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Geert:
> >
> > Can you test the patch below?  It ought to fix the problem (although it
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> root@...salvator-xs:~# ls -l /sys/bus/gadget/devices/
> total 0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 14  2019 gadget.0 ->
> ../../../devices/platform/soc/e659c000.usb/gadget.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 14  2019 gadget.1 ->
> ../../../devices/platform/soc/ee020000.usb/gadget.1
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 14  2019 gadget.2 ->
> ../../../devices/platform/soc/e6590000.usb/gadget.2
> 
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> 
> LGTM, so
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Thanks!

> > might end up causing other problems down the line...)
> 
> Can you please elaborate? I'm not too familiar with UBS gadgets.

I was concerned about the fact that changing the name of a file, 
directory, or symbolic link in sysfs means changing a user API, and so 
it might cause some existing programs to fail.  That would be a 
regression.

Perhaps the best way to work around the problem is to leave the name set 
to "gadget" if the ID number is 0, while adding the ID number on to the 
name if the value is > 0.  What do you think?

Alan Stern