[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <260dccd8-a4f6-882c-8767-5bc27576df14@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:25:06 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhe@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com,
fabiomirmar@...il.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
corbet@....net, d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/30] panic: Refactor the panic path
On 29/04/2022 13:04, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 27/04/2022 21:28, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/27/22 15:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>>> + crash_kexec_post_notifiers
>>> + This was DEPRECATED - users should always prefer the
>>
>> This is DEPRECATED - users should always prefer the
>>
>>> + parameter "panic_notifiers_level" - check its entry
>>> + in this documentation for details on how it works.
>>> + Setting this parameter is exactly the same as setting
>>> + "panic_notifiers_level=4".
>>
>
> Thanks Randy, for your suggestion - but I confess I couldn't understand
> it properly. It's related to spaces/tabs, right? What you suggest me to
> change in this formatting? Just by looking the email I can't parse.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Guilherme
Complete lack of attention from me, apologies!
The suggestions was s/was/is - already fixed for V2, thanks Randy.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists