linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 6/6] perf tools: arm64: Add support for VG register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220509144257.1623063-7-james.clark@arm.com>
Date:   Mon,  9 May 2022 15:42:54 +0100
From:   James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     german.gomez@....com, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/6] perf tools: arm64: Add support for VG register

Add the name of the VG register so it can be used in --user-regs

The event will fail to open if the register is requested but not
available so only add it to the mask if the kernel supports sve and also
if it supports that specific register.

Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c            |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
index 476b037eea1c..c0a921512a90 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,9 +2,11 @@
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <regex.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <sys/auxv.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/zalloc.h>
 
+#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
 #include "../../../util/debug.h"
 #include "../../../util/event.h"
 #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
@@ -43,6 +45,7 @@ const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
 	SMPL_REG(lr, PERF_REG_ARM64_LR),
 	SMPL_REG(sp, PERF_REG_ARM64_SP),
 	SMPL_REG(pc, PERF_REG_ARM64_PC),
+	SMPL_REG(vg, PERF_REG_ARM64_VG),
 	SMPL_REG_END
 };
 
@@ -131,3 +134,34 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
 
 	return SDT_ARG_VALID;
 }
+
+uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void)
+{
+	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+		.type                   = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+		.config                 = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+		.sample_type            = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER,
+		.disabled               = 1,
+		.exclude_kernel         = 1,
+		.sample_period		= 1,
+		.sample_regs_user	= PERF_REGS_MASK
+	};
+	int fd;
+
+	if (getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_SVE)
+		attr.sample_regs_user |= SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_VG);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
+	 * returning the register mask to sample.
+	 */
+	if (attr.sample_regs_user != PERF_REGS_MASK) {
+		event_attr_init(&attr);
+		fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+		if (fd != -1) {
+			close(fd);
+			return attr.sample_regs_user;
+		}
+	}
+	return PERF_REGS_MASK;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index a982e40ee5a9..872dd3d38782 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static const char *__perf_reg_name_arm64(int id)
 		return "lr";
 	case PERF_REG_ARM64_PC:
 		return "pc";
+	case PERF_REG_ARM64_VG:
+		return "vg";
 	default:
 		return NULL;
 	}
-- 
2.28.0