[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnktAONWLGsd/1Q8@myrica>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:02:24 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...mail.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] core/urgent for v5.18-rc6
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:36:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And yes, the mmu notifiers do then take that mmgrab reference to the
> mm, so it all works.
>
> But it sure looks horrendously ugly. Saving off a 'struct mm_struct'
> pointer with having basically an accidental reference to it is WRONG.
Yes it is fragile. We're currently reworking iommu_sva_bind_device() to
factor more code into the IOMMU core and to add explicit mmgrab/mmdrop, so
once this lands we won't depend on mmu_notifier_register() anymore to hold
the mm reference.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220502014842.991097-9-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
Thanks,
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists