linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YnktokC8Uk9j53yO@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 11:05:06 -0400
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        USB mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:42:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:15 PM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 09:46:25AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > Geert:
> > > >
> > > > Can you test the patch below?  It ought to fix the problem (although it
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > root@...salvator-xs:~# ls -l /sys/bus/gadget/devices/
> > > total 0
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 14  2019 gadget.0 ->
> > > ../../../devices/platform/soc/e659c000.usb/gadget.0
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 14  2019 gadget.1 ->
> > > ../../../devices/platform/soc/ee020000.usb/gadget.1
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Feb 14  2019 gadget.2 ->
> > > ../../../devices/platform/soc/e6590000.usb/gadget.2
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > >
> > > LGTM, so
> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > > might end up causing other problems down the line...)
> > >
> > > Can you please elaborate? I'm not too familiar with UBS gadgets.
> >
> > I was concerned about the fact that changing the name of a file,
> > directory, or symbolic link in sysfs means changing a user API, and so
> > it might cause some existing programs to fail.  That would be a
> > regression.
> >
> > Perhaps the best way to work around the problem is to leave the name set
> > to "gadget" if the ID number is 0, while adding the ID number on to the
> > name if the value is > 0.  What do you think?
> 
> Oh, you mean the "gadget.N" subdirs, which are the targets of the
> symlinks above? These were indeed named "gadget" before.
> 
> Would it be possible to append the ".N" suffixes only to the actual
> symlinks, while keeping the target directory names unchanged?
> E.g. /sys/bus/gadget/devices/gadget.0 ->
> ../../../devices/platform/soc/e659c000.usb/gadget

No, it's not possible.  Or at least, not without significant changes to 
the driver core.  Besides, people expect these names to be the same.

Alan Stern