linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 42/70] selftests/seccomp: Dont call read() on TTY from background pgrp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220510130734.091625379@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 15:08:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 42/70] selftests/seccomp: Dont call read() on TTY from background pgrp

From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>

commit 2bfed7d2ffa5d86c462d3e2067f2832eaf8c04c7 upstream.

Since commit 92d25637a3a4 ("kselftest: signal all child processes"), tests
are executed in background process groups. This means that trying to read
from stdin now throws SIGTTIN when stdin is a TTY, which breaks some
seccomp selftests that try to use read(0, NULL, 0) as a dummy syscall.

The simplest way to fix that is probably to just use -1 instead of 0 as
the dummy read()'s FD.

Fixes: 92d25637a3a4 ("kselftest: signal all child processes")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319010011.1374622-1-jannh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ TEST(ERRNO_valid)
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, ret);
 
 	EXPECT_EQ(parent, syscall(__NR_getppid));
-	EXPECT_EQ(-1, read(0, NULL, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, read(-1, NULL, 0));
 	EXPECT_EQ(E2BIG, errno);
 }
 
@@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ TEST(ERRNO_zero)
 
 	EXPECT_EQ(parent, syscall(__NR_getppid));
 	/* "errno" of 0 is ok. */
-	EXPECT_EQ(0, read(0, NULL, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, read(-1, NULL, 0));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ TEST(ERRNO_capped)
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, ret);
 
 	EXPECT_EQ(parent, syscall(__NR_getppid));
-	EXPECT_EQ(-1, read(0, NULL, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, read(-1, NULL, 0));
 	EXPECT_EQ(4095, errno);
 }
 
@@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ TEST(ERRNO_order)
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, ret);
 
 	EXPECT_EQ(parent, syscall(__NR_getppid));
-	EXPECT_EQ(-1, read(0, NULL, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(-1, read(-1, NULL, 0));
 	EXPECT_EQ(12, errno);
 }
 
@@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ void *tsync_sibling(void *data)
 	ret = prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0);
 	if (!ret)
 		return (void *)SIBLING_EXIT_NEWPRIVS;
-	read(0, NULL, 0);
+	read(-1, NULL, 0);
 	return (void *)SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED;
 }