[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220510130734.740079392@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:08:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 64/70] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched()
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
commit 3e61e95e2d095e308616cba4ffb640f95a480e01 upstream.
The callbacks processing time limit makes sure we are not exceeding a
given amount of time executing the queue.
However its "continue" clause bypasses the cond_resched() call on
rcuc and NOCB kthreads, delaying it until we reach the limit, which can
be very long...
Make sure the scheduler has a higher priority than the time limit.
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
[UR: backport to 5.10-stable + commit update]
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2490,10 +2490,22 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
* Stop only if limit reached and CPU has something to do.
* Note: The rcl structure counts down from zero.
*/
- if (-rcl.len >= bl && !offloaded &&
- (need_resched() ||
- (!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
- break;
+ if (in_serving_softirq()) {
+ if (-rcl.len >= bl && (need_resched() ||
+ (!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
+ break;
+ } else {
+ local_bh_enable();
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ local_bh_disable();
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure we don't spend too much time here and deprive other
+ * softirq vectors of CPU cycles.
+ */
if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
if (likely((-rcl.len & 31) || local_clock() < tlimit))
@@ -2501,14 +2513,6 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
/* Exceeded the time limit, so leave. */
break;
}
- if (offloaded) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(in_serving_softirq());
- local_bh_enable();
- lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
- cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
- lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
- local_bh_disable();
- }
}
local_irq_save(flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists