linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 007/135] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 15:06:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 007/135] mmc: core: Set HS clock speed before sending HS CMD13

From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>

commit 4bc31edebde51fcf8ad0794763b8679a7ecb5ec0 upstream.

Way back in commit 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to
hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es"), Rockchip engineers noticed that
some eMMC don't respond to SEND_STATUS commands very reliably if they're
still running at a low initial frequency. As mentioned in that commit,
JESD84-B51 P49 suggests a sequence in which the host:
1. sets HS_TIMING
2. bumps the clock ("<= 52 MHz")
3. sends further commands

It doesn't exactly require that we don't use a lower-than-52MHz
frequency, but in practice, these eMMC don't like it.

The aforementioned commit tried to get that right for HS400ES, although
it's unclear whether this ever truly worked as committed into mainline,
as other changes/refactoring adjusted the sequence in conflicting ways:

08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode
switch")

53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode
for mmc")

In any case, today we do step 3 before step 2. Let's fix that, and also
apply the same logic to HS200/400, where this eMMC has problems too.

Resolves errors like this seen when booting some RK3399 Gru/Scarlet
systems:

[    2.058881] mmc1: CQHCI version 5.10
[    2.097545] mmc1: SDHCI controller on fe330000.mmc [fe330000.mmc] using ADMA
[    2.209804] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -84
[    2.215597] mmc1: error -84 whilst initialising MMC card
[    2.417514] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
[    2.423373] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
[    2.605052] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
[    2.617944] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
[    2.835884] mmc1: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
[    2.841751] mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card

Ealier versions of this patch bumped to 200MHz/HS200 speeds too early,
which caused issues on, e.g., qcom-msm8974-fairphone-fp2. (Thanks for
the report Luca!) After a second look, it appears that aligns with
JESD84 / page 45 / table 28, so we need to keep to lower (HS / 52 MHz)
rates first.

Fixes: 08573eaf1a70 ("mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch")
Fixes: 53e60650f74e ("mmc: core: Allow CMD13 polling when switching to HS mode for mmc")
Fixes: 4f25580fb84d ("mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es")
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/11962455.O9o76ZdvQC@g550jk/
Reported-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422100824.v4.1.I484f4ee35609f78b932bd50feed639c29e64997e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -1381,13 +1381,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle
+	 * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency.
+	 */
 	mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS);
+	mmc_set_bus_speed(card);
+
 	err = mmc_switch_status(card, true);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_err;
 
-	mmc_set_clock(host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr);
-
 	/* Switch card to DDR with strobe bit */
 	val = EXT_CSD_DDR_BUS_WIDTH_8 | EXT_CSD_BUS_WIDTH_STROBE;
 	err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
@@ -1445,7 +1449,7 @@ out_err:
 static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
 {
 	struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
-	unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage;
+	unsigned int old_timing, old_signal_voltage, old_clock;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	u8 val;
 
@@ -1476,8 +1480,17 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_c
 				   false, true, MMC_CMD_RETRIES);
 		if (err)
 			goto err;
+
+		/*
+		 * Bump to HS timing and frequency. Some cards don't handle
+		 * SEND_STATUS reliably at the initial frequency.
+		 * NB: We can't move to full (HS200) speeds until after we've
+		 * successfully switched over.
+		 */
 		old_timing = host->ios.timing;
+		old_clock = host->ios.clock;
 		mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200);
+		mmc_set_clock(card->host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr);
 
 		/*
 		 * For HS200, CRC errors are not a reliable way to know the
@@ -1490,8 +1503,10 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_c
 		 * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
 		 * it is a switch error.
 		 */
-		if (err == -EBADMSG)
+		if (err == -EBADMSG) {
+			mmc_set_clock(host, old_clock);
 			mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
+		}
 	}
 err:
 	if (err) {