lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 16:07:23 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Add an option to ON/OFF an offloading from RT
 context

On 2022-05-05 12:09:15 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> All good points!
> 
> Some questions and comments below.
> 
> Adding Sebastian on CC for his perspective.

Thank you.
I may missing things, I tried to digest the thread…

In my understanding: The boosting option is used to allow a SCHED_OTHER
task within a RCU section to allow to leave the RCU section while tasks
with higher priority occupy the CPU.
As far as the RCU callbacks are concerned, I'm not aware that it would
be beneficial to run them with an elevated priority. On SMP systems,
there is the suggestion to have a housekeeping CPU and to offload the
RCU callbacks to this CPU and no to bother the CPU with the RT workload.

> 						Thanx, Paul

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ