lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220510154340.153400-20-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 11:43:39 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 20/21] block: Do not call folio_next() on an unreferenced folio

From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>

[ Upstream commit 170f37d6aa6ad4582eefd7459015de79e244536e ]

It is unsafe to call folio_next() on a folio unless you hold a reference
on it that prevents it from being split or freed.  After returning
from the iterator, iomap calls folio_end_writeback() which may drop
the last reference to the page, or allow the page to be split.  If that
happens, the iterator will not advance far enough through the bio_vec,
leading to assertion failures like the BUG() in folio_end_writeback()
that checks we're not trying to end writeback on a page not currently
under writeback.  Other assertion failures were also seen, but they're
all explained by this one bug.

Fix the bug by remembering where the next folio starts before returning
from the iterator.  There are other ways of fixing this bug, but this
seems the simplest.

Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/bio.h | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index 117d7f248ac9..2ca54c084d5a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ struct folio_iter {
 	size_t offset;
 	size_t length;
 	/* private: for use by the iterator */
+	struct folio *_next;
 	size_t _seg_count;
 	int _i;
 };
@@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
 			PAGE_SIZE * (bvec->bv_page - &fi->folio->page);
 	fi->_seg_count = bvec->bv_len;
 	fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio) - fi->offset, fi->_seg_count);
+	fi->_next = folio_next(fi->folio);
 	fi->_i = i;
 }
 
@@ -293,9 +295,10 @@ static inline void bio_next_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	fi->_seg_count -= fi->length;
 	if (fi->_seg_count) {
-		fi->folio = folio_next(fi->folio);
+		fi->folio = fi->_next;
 		fi->offset = 0;
 		fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio), fi->_seg_count);
+		fi->_next = folio_next(fi->folio);
 	} else if (fi->_i + 1 < bio->bi_vcnt) {
 		bio_first_folio(fi, bio, fi->_i + 1);
 	} else {
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ