[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220509210404.6a43aff15d0d6b3af0741001@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 21:04:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mike.kravetz@...cle.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
songmuchun@...edance.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, deller@....de,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
ysato@...rs.osdn.me, dalias@...c.org, davem@...emloft.net,
arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb issue when
unmapping or migrating
On Tue, 10 May 2022 11:45:57 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now migrating a hugetlb page or unmapping a poisoned hugetlb page, we'll
> use ptep_clear_flush() and set_pte_at() to nuke the page table entry
> and remap it, and this is incorrect for CONT-PTE or CONT-PMD size hugetlb
> page,
It would be helpful to describe why it's wrong. Something like "should
use huge_ptep_clear_flush() and huge_ptep_clear_flush() for this
purpose"?
> which will cause potential data consistent issue. This patch set
> will change to use hugetlb related APIs to fix this issue, please find
> details in each patch. Thanks.
Is a cc:stable needed here? And are we able to identify a target for a
Fixes: tag?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists