linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] getting misc stats/attributes via xattr API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220510232552.GD2306852@dread.disaster.area>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 09:25:52 +1000
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] getting misc stats/attributes via xattr API

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:35:12PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 02:48:15PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > One comment about this. We really need to have this interface support
> > giving us mount options like "relatime" back in numeric form (I assume
> > this will be possible.). It is royally annoying having to maintain a
> > mapping table in userspace just to do:
> > 
> > relatime -> MS_RELATIME/MOUNT_ATTR_RELATIME
> > ro	 -> MS_RDONLY/MOUNT_ATTR_RDONLY
> > 
> > A library shouldn't be required to use this interface. Conservative
> > low-level software that keeps its shared library dependencies minimal
> > will need to be able to use that interface without having to go to an
> > external library that transforms text-based output to binary form (Which
> > I'm very sure will need to happen if we go with a text-based
> > interface.).
> 
> Sounds like David's fsinfo() :-)
> 
> We need an interface where the kernel returns a consistent mount table    
> entry (more syscalls to get more key=value could be a way how to get
> inconsistent data).                                              
> 
> IMHO all the attempts to make a trivial interface will be unsuccessful
> because the mount table is complex (tree) and mixes strings, paths,
> and flags. We will always end with a complex interface or complex
> strings (like the last xatts attempt). There is no 3rd path to go ...
> 
> The best would be simplified fsinfo() where userspace defines
> a request (wanted "keys"), and the kernel fills a buffer with data
> separated by some header metadata struct. In this case, the kernel can
> return strings and structs with binary data.  
> 
> 
> I'd love something like:
> 
> ssize_t sz;
> fsinfo_query query[] = {
>     { .request = FSINFO_MOUNT_PATH },
>     { .request = FSINFO_PROPAGATION },
>     { .request = FSINFO_CHILDREN_IDS },
> };
> 
> sz = fsinfo(dfd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH,
>                 &query, ARRAY_SIZE(query),
>                 buf, sizeof(buf));
> 
> for (p = buf; p < buf + sz; ) {
> {
>     fsinfo_entry *e = (struct fsinfo_entry) p;
>     char *data = p + sizeof(struct fsinfo_entry);
> 
>     switch(e->request) {
>     case FSINFO_MOUNT_PATH:
>         printf("mountpoint %s\n", data);
>         break;
>     case FSINFO_PROPAGATION:
>         printf("propagation %x\n", (uintptr_t) data);
>         break;
>     case FSINFO_CHILDREN_IDS:
>         fsinfo_child *x = (fsinfo_child *) data;
>         for (i = 0; i < e->count; i++) {
>             printf("child: %d\n", x[i].mnt_id);
>         }
>         break;
>     ...
>     }
> 
>     p += sizeof(struct fsinfo_entry) + e->len;
> }

That's pretty much what a multi-xattr get operation looks like.
It's a bit more more intricate in the setup of the request/return
buffer, but otherwise the structure of the code is the same.

I just don't see why we need special purpose interfaces like this
for key/value information when small tweaks to the existing
generic key/value interfaces can provide exactly the same
functionality....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com