linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: 8250_mtk: Make sure to select the right FEATURE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b13b019f-f766-60df-3764-d375f64ea7d3@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 14:46:28 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com,
        colin.king@...el.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wenst@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: 8250_mtk: Make sure to select the right
 FEATURE_SEL"

Il 10/05/22 14:45, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:26:20PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> It was found that some MediaTek SoCs are incompatible with this
>> change. Also, this register was mistakenly understood as it was
>> related to the 16550A register layout selection but, at least
>> on some IPs, if not all, it's related to something else unknown.
>>
>> This reverts commit 6f81fdded0d024c7d4084d434764f30bca1cd6b1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
> 
> Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>


Sorry for missing this tag, and also I'm sorry for the noise.

Regards,
Angelo