[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnvbLx9FKgQwZJ/F@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 11:50:07 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...mail.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Link: tag and links to submission and reports (was: Re: [GIT
pull] core/urgent for v5.18-rc6)
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> - The problem is when the discussion happened somewhere and the patch
> got submitted separately. I can't think of a good way to automate
> that so we have to pay attention and fix the link tag by hand and add
> the relevant one. And I try to do that when I'm especially awake when
> applying the patch.
I would argue that it should be the patch submitter's responsibility
to explicitly add a URL to the problem report. In some cases this
might be a pointer to a bug tracking system; in other cases it might
be a URL to lore.kernel.org.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists