linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: Reorganize checks in cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 17:48:41 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: Reorganize checks in cpufreq_offline()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Notice that cpufreq_offline() only needs to check policy_is_inactive()
once and rearrange the code in there to make that happen.

No expected functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1590,24 +1590,18 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int
 	}
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+
 	if (has_target())
 		cpufreq_stop_governor(policy);
 
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
 
-	if (policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
-		if (has_target())
-			strncpy(policy->last_governor, policy->governor->name,
-				CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
-		else
-			policy->last_policy = policy->policy;
-	} else if (cpu == policy->cpu) {
-		/* Nominate new CPU */
-		policy->cpu = cpumask_any(policy->cpus);
-	}
-
-	/* Start governor again for active policy */
 	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
+		/* Nominate a new CPU if necessary. */
+		if (cpu == policy->cpu)
+			policy->cpu = cpumask_any(policy->cpus);
+
+		/* Start the governor again for the active policy. */
 		if (has_target()) {
 			ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
 			if (ret)
@@ -1617,6 +1611,12 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
+	if (has_target())
+		strncpy(policy->last_governor, policy->governor->name,
+			CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
+	else
+		policy->last_policy = policy->policy;
+
 	if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
 		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
 		policy->cdev = NULL;