[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48f164af-99d2-9e74-e307-003be0677384@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:34:38 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Jens Frederich <jfrederich@...il.com>,
Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn>,
Zheyu Ma <zheyuma97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c
Hello Guenter,
On 5/11/22 19:17, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/11/22 10:00, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[snip]
>>> struct fb_info *registered_fb[FB_MAX] __read_mostly;
>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(registered_fb);
>>> -
>>> int num_registered_fb __read_mostly;
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FB_OLPC_DCON)
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(registered_fb);
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(num_registered_fb);
>>> +#endif
>>
>> It is stuff like this I refer to as "ugly" in the comment above.
>>
>
> My "solution" for that kind of thing is to use a namespace,
> such as
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(registered_fb, FB_OLPC_DCON);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(num_registered_fb, FB_OLPC_DCON);
>
Using a namespace in this case is indeed a great idea I think.
I've used in the past to limit the export of a symbol for within a driver
that could be scattered across different compilations units, but it never
occurred to me using it to limit symbols exported by core code.
> and import it from the offending code. That avoids ifdefs
> while at the same time limiting the use of the symbols
> to the expected scope. Of course that could be abused but
> that abuse would be obvious.
>
Agreed. For the next revision, besides using an namespaced export symbol
as you suggested, I'll include a comment to make clear that it shouldn't
by any other driver and FB_OLPC_DCON fixed instead.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists