[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220511023109.GA13360@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 08:01:09 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
To: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
CC: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"Matthias Kaehlcke" <mka@...omium.org>,
Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
<quic_vpulyala@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update SNPS Phy params for
SC7280 IDP device
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:05:42PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>
> On 5/9/2022 8:50 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> >Hi Krishna,
> >
> >On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 05:42:27PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> >>Overriding the SNPS Phy tuning parameters for SC7280 IDP device.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <quic_c_sanm@...cinc.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
> >>---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >>index 5eb6689..ad85ffb 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >>@@ -325,6 +325,12 @@
> >> vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l10c_0p8>;
> >> vdda33-supply = <&vreg_l2b_3p0>;
> >> vdda18-supply = <&vreg_l1c_1p8>;
> >>+ qcom,hs-rise-fall-time-bps = <0>;
> >>+ qcom,squelch-detector-bps = <(-2090)>;
> >>+ qcom,hs-disconnect-bps = <1743>;
> >>+ qcom,hs-amplitude-bps = <1780>;
> >>+ qcom,hs-crossover-voltage = <(-31)>;
> >>+ qcom,hs-output-impedance = <2600>;
> >> };
> >Is this an example change or do we see any HS electrical compliance failures
> >on SC7280 IDP that will get fixed with these override sequence?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Pavan
>
> Hi Pavan,
>
> These results were based on compliance testing results.
>
Ok, Do we know what tests are failing and getting fixed with these settings?
Can you mention it in the changelog?
Thanks,
Pavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists