linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <997ea6e0a1f2c40f429ad1f457566cdd80458c78.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 15:12:38 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec

On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 19:56 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 01:53:23PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > This patch doesn't apply to Linus' master branch.  Which tip/master
> > branch?
> 
> This one:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/

thanks!

> 
> Considering how the majority of the changes are x86-specific, I was
> thinking I'd carry it through the tip tree after getting your ACK for
> the IMA side of things?

Agreed, all of the changes should be architecture specific.  It should
definitely be upstreamed via x86.

thanks,

Mimi