[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e12933c9-0439-410b-e691-0fa444c71011@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 00:47:37 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie,
agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Cc: quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_aravindh@...cinc.com,
quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/msm/dp: Always clear mask bits to disable
interrupts at dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl()
On 12/05/2022 00:40, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> dp_catalog_ctrl_reset() will software reset DP controller. But it will
> not reset programmable registers to default value. DP driver still have
> to clear mask bits to interrupt status registers to disable interrupts
> after software reset of controller. This patch removes the enable flag
> condition checking to always clear mask bits of interrupt status
> registers to disable interrupts if enable flag is false.
>
> This patch also will fix the potential problem happen at system suspend where
> dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl() was called to try to disable HPD related irqs but
> the irq is still unmasked unexpectedly
Why is it unmasked? Especially unexpectedly.
> and can come in while system are
> suspending. This leads to bus hangs if the irq is handled after we power down
> the DP hardware because we run the irq handler and access a device register
> assuming that no irq could ever come in if we powered down the device. We
> don't know when the irq will be handled though, so it's possible the irq is
> pending from before we disable the irq in the hardware.
Please split into two patches.
>
> Changes in v2:
> -- add more details commit text
>
> Changes in v3:
> -- add synchrons_irq()
> -- add atomic_t suspended
>
> Changes in v4:
> -- correct Fixes's commit ID
>
> Fixes: 989ebe7bc446 ("drm/msm/dp: do not initialize phy until plugin interrupt received")
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 9 +++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> index af7a80c..f3e333e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> @@ -1389,8 +1389,13 @@ void dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl, bool enable)
>
> dp_catalog_ctrl_reset(ctrl->catalog);
>
> - if (enable)
> - dp_catalog_ctrl_enable_irq(ctrl->catalog, enable);
> + /*
> + * all dp controller programmable registers will not
> + * be reset to default value after DP_SW_RESET
> + * therefore interrupt mask bits have to be updated
> + * to enable/disable interrupts
> + */
> + dp_catalog_ctrl_enable_irq(ctrl->catalog, enable);
> }
>
> void dp_ctrl_phy_init(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index c388323..c34dbfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct dp_display_private {
> struct dp_ctrl *ctrl;
> struct dp_debug *debug;
>
> + atomic_t suspended;
Usage of atomic_t signifies that something is wrong here. Bool should be
enough here.
> +
> struct dp_usbpd_cb usbpd_cb;
> struct dp_display_mode dp_mode;
> struct msm_dp dp_display;
> @@ -187,6 +189,11 @@ static int dp_add_event(struct dp_display_private *dp_priv, u32 event,
> int pndx;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dp_priv->event_lock, flag);
> + if (atomic_read(&dp_priv->suspended)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp_priv->event_lock, flag);
> + return -EPERM;
Why EPERM?
> + }
> +
> pndx = dp_priv->event_pndx + 1;
> pndx %= DP_EVENT_Q_MAX;
> if (pndx == dp_priv->event_gndx) {
> @@ -454,6 +461,13 @@ static void dp_display_host_deinit(struct dp_display_private *dp)
> dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
> dp->phy_initialized);
>
> + if (!dp->core_initialized) {
Can this happen?
> + DRM_DEBUG_DP("DP core not initialized\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + synchronize_irq(dp->irq);
Why? If you need to run with IRQs disabled, you can use
suspend_late/early_resume. But generally it should be enough to check
for the !suspended in the IRQ.
> +
> dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(dp->ctrl, false);
> dp_aux_deinit(dp->aux);
> dp_power_deinit(dp->power);
> @@ -1362,6 +1376,8 @@ static int dp_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
> dp->phy_initialized, dp_display->power_on);
>
> + atomic_set(&dp->suspended, 0);
> +
> /* start from disconnected state */
> dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECTED;
>
> @@ -1431,6 +1447,8 @@ static int dp_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
> dp->phy_initialized, dp_display->power_on);
>
> + atomic_inc(&dp->suspended);
> +
> /* mainlink enabled */
> if (dp_power_clk_status(dp->power, DP_CTRL_PM))
> dp_ctrl_off_link_stream(dp->ctrl);
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists