linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: support control THP behaviour in cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 19:47:29 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     CGEL <cgel.zte@...il.com>
Cc:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: support control THP behaviour in cgroup

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:19 PM CGEL <cgel.zte@...il.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> > > >
> > > > All controls in cgroup v2 should be hierarchical. This is really
> > > > required for a proper delegation semantic.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could we align to the semantic of /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.swappiness?
> > > Some distributions like Ubuntu is still using cgroup v1.
> >
> > Other than enable flag, how would you handle the defrag flag
> > hierarchically? It is much more complicated.
>
> Refer to memory.swappiness for cgroup, this new interface better be independent.

Let me give my 0.02. I buy the use-case of Admin restricting THPs to
low priority jobs but I don't think memory controller is the right
place to enforce that policy. Michal gave one way (prctl()) to enforce
that policy. Have you explored the BPF way to enforce this policy?