linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/88] 4.19.242-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 07:40:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/88] 4.19.242-rc1 review

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:34:21PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:18 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.242 release.
> > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 12 May 2022 13:07:16 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Just some initial report for you,
> 
> I just moved to gcc-12 and many mips builds are failing with errors like:
> arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c: In function 'plat_mem_setup':
> arch/mips/lantiq/prom.c:82:30: error: comparison between two arrays
> [-Werror=array-compare]
>    82 |         else if (__dtb_start != __dtb_end)
> 
> It will need d422c6c0644b ("MIPS: Use address-of operator on section
> symbols")  for all branches upto v5.10-stable.

But gcc-11 still works, right?  We really haven't started adding the
needed changes for gcc-12 to all of the branches yet.

thanks,

greg k-h