[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91c006d0-c6ff-71fa-f0c3-22cf1896fc02@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 08:21:36 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Remove pointless synchronize_irq() in
uart_port_shutdown()
On 10. 05. 22, 15:54, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> From: Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff@....com>
>
> Calling synchronize_irq() after free_irq() is pointless, the context to
> the irq is already lost.
> It was noticed while creating the bugfix "genirq: Synchronize interrupt
> thread startup".
That's correct for most drivers. But some drivers don't call free_irq()
in ->shutdown(). So you likely have to move the synchronization to them.
By a quick grep, I found icom, jsm, sccnxp, sifive, sunhv, and sunzilog.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff@....com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index 57840cf90388..b76e76e650ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -1704,12 +1704,6 @@ static void uart_port_shutdown(struct tty_port *port)
> */
> if (uport)
> uport->ops->shutdown(uport);
> -
> - /*
> - * Ensure that the IRQ handler isn't running on another CPU.
> - */
> - if (uport)
> - synchronize_irq(uport->irq);
> }
>
> static int uart_carrier_raised(struct tty_port *port)
>
>
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists