linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: gpio-mvebu: convert txt binding to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 09:23:57 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: gpio-mvebu: convert txt binding to
 YAML

On 10/05/2022 22:55, Chris Packham wrote:
> (sigh resend, Thunderbird decided that this needed html)
> 
> On 11/05/22 01:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> +  marvell,pwm-offset:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +    description: Offset in the register map for the pwm registers (in bytes)
>> It's the same as offset. Why allowing both? Isn't one deprecated?
>>
> This one is in addition to offset. The "offset" is for the gpio 
> registers "marvell,pwm-offset" is for a separate pwm related register 
> that is not in the same contiguous block.

I see now different in the description. Egh, confusing. But the
confusion was done earlier, so let it be.

Best regards,
Krzysztof