[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7376f263-3443-06a0-5ef6-d11be1acd836@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 09:23:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: gpio-mvebu: convert txt binding to
YAML
On 10/05/2022 22:55, Chris Packham wrote:
> (sigh resend, Thunderbird decided that this needed html)
>
> On 11/05/22 01:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> + marvell,pwm-offset:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> + description: Offset in the register map for the pwm registers (in bytes)
>> It's the same as offset. Why allowing both? Isn't one deprecated?
>>
> This one is in addition to offset. The "offset" is for the gpio
> registers "marvell,pwm-offset" is for a separate pwm related register
> that is not in the same contiguous block.
I see now different in the description. Egh, confusing. But the
confusion was done earlier, so let it be.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists