linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] locking/atomic/x86: Introduce try

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFULd4aXpt_pnCR5OK5B1m5sErfB3uj_ez=-KW7=0qQheEdVzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 10:24:02 +0200
From:   Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomic/x86: Introduce try_cmpxchg64

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:54 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:07:25PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:55 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:42:17PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > > This patch adds try_cmpxchg64 to improve code around cmpxchg8b.  While
> > > > the resulting code improvements on x86_64 are minor (a compare and a move saved),
> > > > the improvements on x86_32 are quite noticeable. The code improves from:
> > >
> > > What user of cmpxchg64 is this?
> >
> > This is cmpxchg64 in pi_try_set_control from
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c, as shown in a RFC patch [1].
>
> I can't read that code, my brain is hard wired to read pi as priority
> inheritance/inversion.
>
> Still, does 32bit actually support that stuff?

Unfortunately, it does:

kvm-intel-y        += vmx/vmx.o vmx/vmenter.o vmx/pmu_intel.o vmx/vmcs12.o \
               vmx/evmcs.o vmx/nested.o vmx/posted_intr.o

And when existing cmpxchg64 is substituted with cmpxchg, the
compilation dies for 32bits with:

error: call to ‘__cmpxchg_wrong_size’ declared with attribute error:
Bad argument size for cmpxchg

So, the majority of the patch deals with 32bits and tries to implement
the inlined insn correctly for all cases. The 64bit part is simply a
call to arch_try_cmpxchg, and the rest is auto-generated from scripts.

>
> > There are some more opportunities for try_cmpxchg64 in KVM, namely
> > fast_pf_fix_direct_spte in arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c and
> > tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic in arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>
> tdp_mmu is definitely 64bit only and as such shouldn't need to use
> cmpxchg64.

Indeed.

>
> Anyway, your patch looks about right, but I find it *really* hard to
> care about 32bit code these days.

Thanks, this is also my sentiment, but I hope the patch will enable
better code and perhaps ease similar situation I have had elsewhere.

Uros.

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:54 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:07:25PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:55 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:42:17PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > > This patch adds try_cmpxchg64 to improve code around cmpxchg8b.  While
> > > > the resulting code improvements on x86_64 are minor (a compare and a move saved),
> > > > the improvements on x86_32 are quite noticeable. The code improves from:
> > >
> > > What user of cmpxchg64 is this?
> >
> > This is cmpxchg64 in pi_try_set_control from
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c, as shown in a RFC patch [1].
>
> I can't read that code, my brain is hard wired to read pi as priority
> inheritance/inversion.
>
> Still, does 32bit actually support that stuff?

Unfortunately, it does:

kvm-intel-y        += vmx/vmx.o vmx/vmenter.o vmx/pmu_intel.o vmx/vmcs12.o \
               vmx/evmcs.o vmx/nested.o vmx/posted_intr.o

And when cmpxchg64 is substituted with cmpxchg, the compilation dies
for 32bits with:

error: call to ‘__cmpxchg_wrong_size’ declared with attribute error:
Bad argument size for cmpxchg

So, the majority of the patch deals with 32bits and tries to implement
the inlined insn correctly for all cases. The 64bit part is simply a
call to arch_try_cmpxchg, and the rest is auto-generated from scripts.

>
> > There are some more opportunities for try_cmpxchg64 in KVM, namely
> > fast_pf_fix_direct_spte in arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c and
> > tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic in arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>
> tdp_mmu is definitely 64bit only and as such shouldn't need to use
> cmpxchg64.

Indeed.

>
> Anyway, your patch looks about right, but I find it *really* hard to
> care about 32bit code these days.

Thanks, this is also my sentiment, but I hope the patch will enable
better code and perhaps ease a similar situation elsewhere in the
sources.

Uros.