linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] usb/peak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZ6RqKHs4gdcNjVONfOTsHh6ZFEt0qpbEaKqDM7c1Cbc1OLdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 17:28:26 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     z <zhaojunkui2008@....com>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Mätje <stefan.maetje@....eu>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bernard@...o.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code

On Wed. 11 May 2022 at 16:11, z <zhaojunkui2008@....com> wrote:
> At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> >On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> >> The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings)
> >> , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch
> >> if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.
> >
> >Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the
> >error handling accordingly.
>
> Hi Marc:
>
> I am not sure if there is some gap.
> If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like:
> if (err) {
>                         dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent,
>                                 "unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n",
>                                 pcan_usb_pro.name, err);
>                         kfree(bi);
>                         kfree(fi);
>                         kfree(usb_if);
>
>                        return err;
>                 }
> I am not sure if this looks a little less clear?
> Thanks!

A cleaner way would be to move all the content of the if
(!dev->prev_siblings) to a new function.


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol