linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/34] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't use sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask() in kvm_hv_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94cec439f345313c1a909f6a012665dd10686d47.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 14:24:37 +0300
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@...zon.de>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/34] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't use
 sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask() in kvm_hv_send_ipi()

On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 15:19 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Get rid of on-stack allocation of vcpu_mask and optimize kvm_hv_send_ipi()
> for a smaller number of vCPUs in the request. When Hyper-V TLB flush
> is in  use, HvSendSyntheticClusterIpi{,Ex} calls are not commonly used to
> send IPIs to a large number of vCPUs (and are rarely used in general).
> 
> Introduce hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set() to directly check if the specified
> VP_ID is present in sparse vCPU set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 3cf68645a2e6..aebbb598ad1d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -1746,6 +1746,25 @@ static void sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sparse_banks,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static bool hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set(u32 vp_id, u64 valid_bank_mask, u64 sparse_banks[])
> +{
> +	int bank, sbank = 0;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(vp_id / HV_VCPUS_PER_SPARSE_BANK,
> +		      (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(bank, (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask,
> +			 KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS) {
> +		if (bank == vp_id / HV_VCPUS_PER_SPARSE_BANK)
> +			break;
> +		sbank++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return test_bit(vp_id % HV_VCPUS_PER_SPARSE_BANK,
> +			(unsigned long *)&sparse_banks[sbank]);
> +}
> +
>  struct kvm_hv_hcall {
>  	u64 param;
>  	u64 ingpa;
> @@ -2089,8 +2108,8 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
>  		((u64)hc->rep_cnt << HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
> -static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
> -				 unsigned long *vcpu_bitmap)
> +static void kvm_hv_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
> +				    u64 *sparse_banks, u64 valid_bank_mask)
I think the indentation is wrong here (was wrong before as well)


>  {
>  	struct kvm_lapic_irq irq = {
>  		.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_FIXED,
> @@ -2100,7 +2119,10 @@ static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
>  	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> -		if (vcpu_bitmap && !test_bit(i, vcpu_bitmap))
> +		if (sparse_banks &&
> +		    !hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set(kvm_hv_get_vpindex(vcpu),
> +					    valid_bank_mask,
> +					    sparse_banks))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* We fail only when APIC is disabled */
> @@ -2113,7 +2135,6 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
>  	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>  	struct hv_send_ipi_ex send_ipi_ex;
>  	struct hv_send_ipi send_ipi;
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(vcpu_mask, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
>  	unsigned long valid_bank_mask;
>  	u64 sparse_banks[KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS];
>  	u32 vector;
> @@ -2175,13 +2196,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
>  	if ((vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) || (vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
>  		return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
>  
> -	if (all_cpus) {
> -		kvm_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, NULL);
> -	} else {
> -		sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask(kvm, sparse_banks, valid_bank_mask, vcpu_mask);
> -
> -		kvm_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, vcpu_mask);
> -	}
> +	kvm_hv_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, all_cpus ? NULL : sparse_banks, valid_bank_mask);
>  
>  ret_success:
>  	return HV_STATUS_SUCCESS;


Overall looks good to me, but I might have missed something.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky