[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220511113039.1252432-1-javierm@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:30:39 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices
Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().
This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.
To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.
A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
a removal loop restart.
Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
---
(no changes since v1)
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/fb.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index b445a7a00def..2fda5917c212 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
{
int i;
+restart_removal:
/* check all firmware fbs and kick off if the base addr overlaps */
for_each_registered_fb(i) {
struct apertures_struct *gen_aper;
@@ -1587,12 +1588,23 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
pr_warn("fb%d: no device set\n", i);
do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
} else if (dev_is_platform(device)) {
- registered_fb[i]->forced_out = true;
+ /*
+ * Drop the lock because if the device is unregistered, its
+ * driver will call to unregister_framebuffer(), that takes
+ * this lock.
+ */
+ mutex_unlock(®istration_lock);
platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(device));
+ mutex_lock(®istration_lock);
} else {
pr_warn("fb%d: cannot remove device\n", i);
do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
}
+ /*
+ * Restart the removal loop now that the device has been
+ * unregistered and its associated framebuffer gone.
+ */
+ goto restart_removal;
}
}
}
@@ -1899,13 +1911,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_framebuffer);
void
unregister_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
{
- bool forced_out = fb_info->forced_out;
-
- if (!forced_out)
- mutex_lock(®istration_lock);
+ mutex_lock(®istration_lock);
do_unregister_framebuffer(fb_info);
- if (!forced_out)
- mutex_unlock(®istration_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(®istration_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_framebuffer);
diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
index 69c67c70fa78..bbe1e4571899 100644
--- a/include/linux/fb.h
+++ b/include/linux/fb.h
@@ -511,7 +511,6 @@ struct fb_info {
} *apertures;
bool skip_vt_switch; /* no VT switch on suspend/resume required */
- bool forced_out; /* set when being removed by another driver */
};
static inline struct apertures_struct *alloc_apertures(unsigned int max_num) {
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists