[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXrd07goR2WffENJnLMAWZxtxoQzaL_7+SG-ZSvaYK1HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:02:01 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: math-emu: Fix dependencies of math emulation support
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:43 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mai 11 2022, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Drop the dependency on MMU, as the code should work fine on 68020 and up
> > without MMU (which are not yet supported by Linux, though).
> > Add dependencies on M68K_CLASSIC (to rule out Coldfire) and FPU (to rule
> > out 68xxx below 68020).
>
> Depending on FPU looks strange, since that is supposed to be an FPU
> emulation, for CPUs that _lack_ an FPU (ie. 680[23]0 without the
> 6888[12], or 68LC0[46]0).
I picked FPU because it is selected by all of M680[2346]0.
Upon closer look, both the hard FPU and soft FPU code are protected
by CONFIG_FPU, so the latter looks like the right symbol.
The FPU emu code also relies on the CPU trapping on the proper
instructions, which I believe you need a 68020+ for, too?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists