lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegtTP==oMm+LhvOkrxkPB973-Y80chbwYpXSiOAXBDhHJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 14:28:34 +0200
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:     Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Prevent re-use of FUSE superblock after force unmount

On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 13:19, Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > At a glance it's a gross hack.   I can think of more than one way in
> > which this could be achieved without adding a new field to struct
> > super_block.
> Can you advise what would be a better way to achieve that?

I think it would be easiest to remove the super block from the
type->fs_supers list.

Thanks,
Miklos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ