[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220510185523.3f7479b8ffc49a8a7c17d328@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Zhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@...wei.com>
Cc: <rppt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <xuqiang36@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: config the number of init memblock regions
On Wed, 11 May 2022 01:05:30 +0000 Zhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@...wei.com> wrote:
> During early boot, the number of memblocks may exceed 128(some memory
> areas are not reported to the kernel due to test failures. As a result,
> contiguous memory is divided into multiple parts for reporting). If
> the size of the init memblock regions is exceeded before the array size
> can be resized, the excess memory will be lost.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -89,6 +89,14 @@ config SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> pfn_to_page and page_to_pfn operations. This is the most
> efficient option when sufficient kernel resources are available.
>
> +config MEMBLOCK_INIT_REGIONS
> + int "Number of init memblock regions"
> + range 128 1024
> + default 128
> + help
> + The number of init memblock regions which used to track "memory" and
> + "reserved" memblocks during early boot.
> +
> config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> bool
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index e4f03a6e8e56..6893d26b750e 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128
> +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_INIT_REGIONS
Consistent naming would be nice - MEMBLOCK_INIT versus INIT_MEMBLOCK.
Can we simply increase INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS to 1024 and avoid the
config option? It appears that the overhead from this would be 60kB or
so. Or zero if CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK and CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
are cooperating.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists