[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGts6cKOrmRruo8uSXSW=Kq58VZxdPuS13Q7jVajbvga-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 06:20:36 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3] drm/msm: Add initial ci/ subdirectory
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:15 PM Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> And use it to store expectations about what the drm/msm driver is
> supposed to pass in the IGT test suite.
>
> Also include a configuration file that points to the out-of-tree CI
> scripts.
>
> By storing the test expectations along the code we can make sure both
> stay in sync with each other, and so we can know when a code change
> breaks those expectations.
>
> This will allow all contributors to drm/msm to reuse the infrastructure
> already in gitlab.freedesktop.org to test the driver on several
> generations of the hardware.
>
> v2:
> - Fix names of result expectation files to match SoC
> - Don't execute tests that are going to skip on all boards
>
> v3:
> - Remove tracking of dmesg output during test execution
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
> Documentation/gpu/msm_automated_testing.rst | 70 +++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml | 11 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm.testlist | 144 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8016_results.txt | 141 +++++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8096_results.txt | 141 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt | 142 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sdm845_results.txt | 142 +++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 791 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/msm_automated_testing.rst
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm.testlist
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8016_results.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_apq8096_results.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sc7180_results.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/msm_sdm845_results.txt
>
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9b7caa7fcab2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +variables:
> + # Change this to use your fork of drm-ci
> + DRM_CI_PROJECT_PATH: &drm-ci-project-path gfx-ci/drm-ci
> + DRM_CI_COMMIT_SHA: &drm-ci-commit-sha msm
btw, shouldn't we list an exact commit sha (or tag) for drm-ci, or am
I overlooking something? We want to be able to uprev the drm-ci
version (and therefore igt version) in sync with any necessary updates
to the expectations
BR,
-R
> +
> +include:
> + - project: *drm-ci-project-path
> + ref: *drm-ci-commit-sha
> + file:
> + - '.msm-gitlab-ci.yml'
> + - '.gitlab-ci.yml'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists