[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xhsmhpmkk17pg.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:10:03 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: fix the case where sched_rt_period_us is
non-positive
On 11/05/22 13:53, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 11/05/22 19:21, Yajun Deng wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
>> index b491a0f8c25d..f20389aa6731 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct ctl_table sched_rt_sysctls[] = {
>> .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
>> .mode = 0644,
>> .proc_handler = sched_rt_handler,
>> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
>> },
>
> Err, what kernel is this based on? AFAICT those have always lived in
> kernel/sysctl.c, not kernel/sched/rt.c
>
Nevermind, Peter pointed out this has recently been changed and is apparent
in linux-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists